-
myLab
-
Services
-
- Acid Number
- Analytical Ferrography
- Base Number: ASTM D2896 vs. D4739
- Crackle Test: Monitoring Water in Used Oil
- Demulsibility
- FTIR Direct Trend Methodology
- Fuel Distillation (ASTM D86)
- ISO Particle Count
- Karl Fischer Water Titration
- Optical Particle Classification (OPC)
- Remaining Useful Life Evaluation Routine (RULER)
- SEM-EDS Wear Debris Analysis
- Total Magnetic Iron (TMI)
- Varnish Potential
-
-
Sampling
-
- Coolant Sampling Procedures
- Grease Sampling Procedures
- Oil Sampling Basics (Short Course)
- Oil Sampling Procedures (Video)
- Oil Sampling Procedures: Good-Better-Best (PDF)
- Sample Collection Basics
- Sampling Oil Using a Drain Plug
- Sampling Oil Using a Pushbutton or KST-Series Valve
- Sampling Oil Using a Sample Pump
- Sampling Oil Using Thread-On Probe Style Valves
- Used Oil Filter Sampling
- Sampling from Filter Carts
-
-
Data Interpretation
-
- Analytical Ferrography Reporting
- Basic Testing Interpretation (PDF)
- Common Wear Mechanisms (PDF)
- Comparison: Wear Debris Analysis Technologies
- DEF Specifications: ISO 22241
- DEF Testing: Data interpretation
- Oil Cleanliness: ISO vs. NAS
- Potential Source of Spectrometry Metals (PDF)
- Reading the OA Report (PDF)
- Understanding ISO Particle Counts (PDF)
- Wear Metal Origins (PDF)
- Why Diesel Fuel Dilution is Bad for Your Engine
-
- Data Interpretation Process (Video)
- Data Interpretation: Compressors (Video)
- Data Interpretation: Diesel Engines (Video)
- Data Interpretation: Grease Analysis for Wind Turbines (VIDEO)
- Data Interpretation: Hydraulics (Video)
- Data Interpretation: Natural Gas Engines (Video)
- Data Interpretation: Oil Analysis for Wind Turbines (Video)
- Data Interpretation: Reducers (Video)
- Data Interpretation: Turbines (Video)
-
-
Whitepapers
-
Success Stories
- Case Study: Early Detection of Bearing Wear
- Rapid Nitrite Depletion in Modern Excavator Cooling Systems: Causes and Solutions
- Unlocking Millions in Maintenance Cost Savings
- Strategic Optimization of Oil Drain Intervals
- The Case for Building Strong Partnerships
- Case Study: Extended Drain Interval
- CARE & Oil Analysis for Early Detection of Issues
- Fuel Dilution of Engine Oil in Mining Dozer
- Early Detection of Wear Metals in Gearbox
- Coolant Contamination in Dozer Engine Oil
-
FAQ
-
Release Notes
Oil Cleanliness: ISO vs. NAS
Oil cleanliness is defined as the measure of the level of particle contaminants in the oil. Particle contaminants can include both insoluble (solid or liquid materials that won’t mix in with the oil) and hard (e.g. metal shavings) particles. OEMs often provide recommendations for acceptable oil cleanliness levels for their equipment. Contamination control through proactive maintenance can ensure cleanliness levels are met, including both insoluble and hard particles.
Rating Systems
Cleanliness is an important indicator of the quality of your lubricating oil. This is often referred to as the oil’s particle count. Oil cleanliness is generally defined by two different particle count rating systems: the National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 1638 and the International Standards Organization (ISO) 4406. These both provide a classification of the number of particles to rate cleanliness
NAS 1638
NAS 1638 includes five “counting ranges” of particle size:
- 5 to 15 microns
- 15 to 25 microns
- 25 to 50 microns
- 50 to 100 microns
- >100 microns
These counting ranges are then classified into contamination levels by a number ranging from 00 (cleanest) to 12 (dirtiest) based on number of particles per 100 mL of fluid for each of the particle size counting ranges.
ISO 4406
ISO 4406 uses three overlapping size classes to rate particles instead of size ranges:
- >4 microns
- >6 microns
- >14 microns
Contamination levels are classified based on the number of particles greater than the three size ranges (4, 6 and 14 microns). This is determined in the equivalent of one millilitre of a fluid sample.
Converting NAS 1638 to ISO 4406
While both standards are applicable for industrial systems, ISO 4406 cleanliness codes are the more common standard in use. Since NAS and ISO use different counting methods, it’s not possible to have an exact conversion between these two standards. Therefore, only approximate comparisons between NAS and ISO are possible.

Additional Resources
Testing: ISO Particle Count
PDF: Understanding ISO Particle Counts
